"The Role of Genetics in Scleroderma"
Is It in Your Genes or in Your Environment?
by Maureen Mayes, M.D., M.P.H., Professor of Medicine,
University of Texas/Houston, (originally published in "Scleroderma
Voice," 2004 #2)
In order to understand this question, it is first
necessary to know the expected prevalence and incidence of scleroderma
in the U.S.
The Prevalence and Incidence of Scleroderma
Working with a team of collaborators, I recently
completed a study (published in 2003) that sought to identify every person
with systemic scleroderma (SSc) in the Detroit area of Michigan. We did
not include localized scleroderma, that is, we did not include cases of
morphea or linear disease, because these cases were too difficult to identify
with the resources we had available to us.
Based on 706 identified and verified cases, and
assuming that the population in Southeast Michigan was representative
of the country as a whole, we calculated the expected total number of
cases in the U.S.
This study estimated that the prevalence (the total
number of cases) of SSc was 250 per million U.S. adults, and the incidence
(the number of new cases per year) in the U.S. was 20 per million U.S.
adults.
This leads to a total number of SSc cases in the
U.S. of about 70,000. It is clear that the study missed some patients,
so this must be interpreted as a conservative estimate. Also, it did not
include those with localized scleroderma.
Who Gets Scleroderma?
With this background information, we compared
our prevalence figures to other reports to see if there is a difference
among populations in terms of who gets scleroderma. Not surprisingly,
80% of our cases were women; systemic scleroderma usually started in adulthood
and was rare in children; and SSc occurred more frequently in the U.S.
than in Europe, Scandinavia, or Japan. There was a group, however, that
had a higher incidence of scleroderma than we estimated, and that was
the Choctaw Native Americans in Oklahoma. (This was reported in 1996.)
Why Is Scleroderma More Prevalent Among the Choctaws?
Although the total number of Choctaw cases was
low, there were many more than would be expected using the Michigan prevalence
figures. In fact, there was almost three times the expected number of
cases among the Choctaw population.
In addition, the Choctaw cases shared many similar
clinical features in that almost all had diffuse skin disease, pulmonary
fibrosis, and the same serum autoantibodies.
Was there a genetic predisposition in these cases
that made them more susceptible to scleroderma? Or was there something
in the environment in the region that was triggering scleroderma?
The non-Choctaws in the region did not seem to
have a lot of scleroderma, so the search focused on studying the genes
in the cases versus the healthy Choctaws.
A genetic analysis called a “genome-wide
scan” was done to see if there were certain gene regions that clustered
in the cases more frequently than in the controls. This was found to be
the case, and a total of 14 gene regions (encompassing hundreds of potentially
relevant genes) were found to be associated with SSc.
Several “interesting” genes are included
within these gene regions, and are now being studied as possible candidates
for disease susceptibility in non-Choctaw scleroderma patients. Some are
genes that control the formation of collagen (but not the actual collagen
genes), some are genes that are involved with the immune system, and some
are genes whose role is unknown.
Well, what about non-Choctaw cases—does scleroderma
run in families? For most people, the answer is “no,” that
is, 98.3% of scleroderma cases will not have a relative with scleroderma.
However, the remaining 1.7% will have another family member affected,
and this is much more than would be expected by chance alone.
Implications of the Choctaw Study
So, how important can a factor be if it only occurs
less that 2% of the time? The answer is that this genetic feature may
hold the key to understanding all or most of scleroderma cases.
What has become clear is that there is no single
gene that causes scleroderma. It is likely that there are many genes,
perhaps a dozen or more, that confer an increased risk of getting the
disease.
It is also clear, that the answer will not be found
in the genes alone. There must be a triggering event that “turns
on” the genes that eventually result in disease expression. The
nature of this triggering event is unknown; it could be a virus, a bacterial
infection, an allergen, or a toxin. In fact, it may be different things
in different people.
Much Work Still Remains
There is much research being done—and much
more that needs to be done. In collaboration with other researchers, I
am studying the genetic makeup of hundreds of scleroderma patients and
thousands of their unaffected relatives to identify which genes are more
frequently seen in the patients than in their healthy relatives.
A very important group to study are those few families
(1.7% of all cases) that have a first-degree family member also affected
with scleroderma.
From the genetic analysis point of view, the “best”
type of family is one in which there are two siblings with scleroderma
(involving brothers and/or sisters).
The Scleroderma Family Registry and DNA Repository
The Scleroderma Family Registry and DNA Repository
is funded by NIH/NIAMS (National Institutes of Health/National Institute
of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal, and Skin Diseases) to identify these susceptibility
genes.
Participation in the Registry involves a phone
interview and a one-time blood draw which can be performed at a local
area doctor’s office or lab.
The Registry also has a sample repository for other
investigators who are doing research in scleroderma but lack a sufficient
number of samples to perform their studies.
The Registry phone number is 1-800-736-6864. Learn
more at www.sclerodermaregistry.org.
We are actively recruiting multicase families
or single-case families in which both parents are available for a blood
sample. It is only through the participation of patients and family members
like yourselves that this work can be done and the answer eventually found.
Print This Page
|